![]() This makes it very very very very very very very very very very (how much times should I repeat this) very very very very very very very easy to track you over different devices, especially browsers with their own advertising schemes. Most multi-platform ease of use benefits are only provided when you log-in or use the browsers cloud storage for syncing. ![]() Mr Benjamin Walsh I have got news for you. It is hilarious to read that he rates the browsers not on their efforts to provide secure extensions, but the number of extensions in the different browser stores, so he is not even evaluating against his own criteria There only a few browsers with their own extension store. Opera is considered average, but it has a build in VPN-proxy which obfuscates the IP-addresģ. I don't see these criteria specified anywhere in the post of Benjamin WalshĢ. So when evaluating the author should show his understanding of the marketing mechanisms by telling which tracking mechanisms are applied most and what he considers stage-1, stage-2 and stage-3 privacy protection. Unless you use a Tor-browser configured correctly (Tor-wiki advised to NOT use VPN because configuring it correctly requires advanced skills which most people using Tor fail to have), total privacy is a lost case. When Edge is average security wise, what about the security features of Edge which other Chromium based browsers do not have like"Ī) de-elevation on start of the broker processī) code integrity guard applied on the renderer processesĢ. ![]() Just compare the per-site settings of Chromium based browsers versus other browsers.ġ. Shooting from the hip, here are just a few commentsġ. Above is a very, very, very limited set of evaluation criteria AND they are not applied correctly, so a sad case of framed information posting
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |